Kotlin-vs-Java. What makes Kotlin an improvement over Java?

28 December 2017

Kotlin vs Java. What to choose?

Where Kotlin takes off is tackling more inherent issues with Java. Kotlin has more than a few

Pros that improve Android Development and App Performance

1. It’s Android-Focused:

Kotlin was written by the same folks who created popular integrated design environments (IDEs), so its background comes from mobile industry pros who were looking to solve specific problems.

2. Making the Switch from Java is easy:

In IntelliJ or Android Studio, converting Java files to Kotlin just requires installing the Kotlin plugin, adding it to the Gradle build files, and clicking convert.

Extension functions, help in building clean APIs and solve a bunch of other problems.

3. It has Null in its Type System:

Nullability problems are common in Java, and Android uses null quite a bit to represent the absence of a value. Having a null point exception can kill an app. Kotlin solves this by having null right in its type system, not forcing developers to use some kind of workaround.

4. It’s Concise:

Java is not known for being the most succinct language, and while that is not a con in and of itself when you are programming for Android and using a bunch of common idioms, verbose code can lead to more chances for bugs. When you can write less code with a more concise language, there are fewer opportunities for errors, and it’s less tedious for developers.

5. It is Versatile and Interoperable with Java:

Developers can write new modules in Kotlin that will work alongside existing Java code. It is compatible with all existing Java libraries and frameworks, the JVM (Java Virtual Machine) and can integrate with the Gradle or Maven build systems. Whereas many languages are hardline functional or object-oriented, it is not overly opinionated and do not enforce one philosophy over another.

It avoids extra garbage collection, a common problem in Android development that adds inefficiency to Java code.